Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrar
1.
authorea preprints; 2024.
Preprint en Inglés | PREPRINT-AUTHOREA PREPRINTS | ID: ppzbmed-10.22541.au.171066542.24869714.v1

RESUMEN

Background: The newly emerged SARS-CoV-2 possesses shared antigenic epitopes with other human coronaviruses. We investigated if COVID-19 vaccination or SARS-CoV-2 infection may boost cross-reactive antibodies to other human coronaviruses. Methods Pre- and post-vaccination sera from SARS-CoV-2 naïve healthy subjects who received three doses of the mRNA vaccine (BioNTech, BNT) or the inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac, CV) were used to monitor the level of cross-reactive antibodies raised against other human coronaviruses by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. In comparison, convalescent sera from COVID-19 patients with or without prior vaccination history were also tested. Pseudoparticle neutralization assay was performed to detect neutralization antibody against MERS-CoV. Results Among SARS-CoV-2 infection naïve subjects, BNT or CV significantly increased the anti-S2 antibodies against Betacoronaviruses (OC43 and MERS-CoV) but not Alphacoronaviruses (229E). The pre-vaccination antibody response to the common cold human coronaviruses did not negatively impact the post-vaccination antibody response to SARS-CoV-2. Cross-reactive antibodies that binds to the S2 protein of MERS-CoV were similarly detected from the convalescent sera of COVID-19 patients with or without vaccination history. However, these anti-S2 antibodies do not possess neutralizing activity in MERS-CoV pseudoparticle neutralisation tests. Conclusions Our results suggest that SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination may potentially modulate population immune landscape against previously exposed or novel human coronaviruses. The findings have implications for future sero-epidemiological studies on MERS-CoV.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus
2.
researchsquare; 2023.
Preprint en Inglés | PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE | ID: ppzbmed-10.21203.rs.3.rs-2786723.v1

RESUMEN

Newborns can acquire immunological protection to SARS-CoV-2 through vaccine-conferred antibodies in human breast milk. However, there are some concerns around lactating mothers with regards to potential short- and long-term adverse events and vaccine-induced changes to their breast milk microbiome composition, which helps shape the early-life microbiome. Here, we recruited 49 lactating mothers from Hong Kong who received two doses of BNT162b2 vaccine between June 2021 and August 2021. Breast milk samples were self-collected by participating mothers pre-vaccination, one week post-first dose, one week post-second dose, and one month post-second dose. The levels of SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific IgA and IgG in breast milk peaked at one week post-second dose. Subsequently, the levels of both antibodies rapidly waned in breast milk, with IgA levels returning to baseline levels one month post-second dose. The richness and composition of human breast milk microbiota changed dynamically throughout the vaccination regimen, but the abundances of beneficial microbes such as Bifidobacterium species did not significantly change after vaccination. In addition, we found that baseline breast milk bacterial composition can predict spike-specific IgA levels at one week post-second dose (Area Under Curve: 0.72, 95% confidence interval: 0.58–0.85). Taken together, our results suggest that infants may acquire immunological protection from breast milk from SARS-CoV-2-vaccinated mothers by both the vertical transmission of antibodies and beneficial microbiota.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Neoplasias de la Mama
3.
medrxiv; 2022.
Preprint en Inglés | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2022.11.29.22282857

RESUMEN

Introduction COVID-19 causes global health and psychosocial devastation, particularly to high-risk patients such as those with neuromuscular diseases (NMDs). The mRNA-based BNT162b2 and inactivated whole-virus CoronaVac are two novel COVID-19 vaccines widely used across the world that confer immune protection to healthy individuals. However, hesitancy towards COVID-19 vaccination was common for patients with NMDs early in the pandemic due to the paucity of data on the safety and efficacy in this specific patient population. Therefore, we examined the underlying factors associated with vaccine hesitancy across time for these patients and included the assessment of the reactogenicity and immunogenicity of these two vaccines. Methods Pediatric patients were screened from our NMD registry. For the vaccine hesitancy arm, those aged 8-18 years with no cognitive delay were invited to complete surveys in January and April 2022. For the reactogenicity and immunogenicity arm, patients aged 2-21 years were enrolled for COVID-19 vaccination between June 2021 to April 2022. Participants recorded adverse reactions (ARs) for 7 days after vaccination. Peripheral blood was obtained before BNT162b2 or CoronaVac and within 49 days after vaccination to measure their serological antibody responses as compared to healthy children and adolescents. Results Forty-one patients completed vaccine hesitancy surveys for both timepoints, and 22 joined our reactogenicity and immunogenicity arm of the study. Two or more family members vaccinated against COVID-19 was positively associated with intention of vaccination (odds ratio 11.7, 95% CI 1.81-75.1, p=0.010). Pain at the injection site, fatigue and myalgia were the commonest ARs. Most ARs were mild (75.5%, n=71/94). All 19 patients seroconverted against the wildtype SARS-CoV-2 after two doses of BNT162b2 or CoronaVac, although there was lower neutralization against the Omicron BA.1 variant. Discussion This study demonstrated vaccine hesitancy amongst patients with NMDs was influenced by family members and changed across time. BNT162b2 and CoronaVac were safe and immunogenic even for patients on low-dose corticosteroids. Future research is required to assess the durability of the COVID-19 vaccines, the effectiveness of booster doses and other routes of administration against emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants for these patients.


Asunto(s)
Dolor , Enfermedades Neuromusculares , Mialgia , COVID-19 , Fatiga
4.
researchsquare; 2022.
Preprint en Inglés | PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE | ID: ppzbmed-10.21203.rs.3.rs-1927944.v1

RESUMEN

Viral and host factors can shape SARS-CoV-2 within-host viral diversity and virus evolution. However, little is known about lineage-specific and vaccination-specific mutations that occur within individuals. Here we analysed deep sequencing data from 2,146 SARS-CoV-2 samples with different viral lineages to describe the patterns of within-host diversity in different conditions, including vaccine-breakthrough infections. Variant of Concern (VOC) Alpha, Delta, and Omicron samples were found to have higher within-host nucleotide diversity while being under weaker purifying selection at full genome level compared to non-VOC SARS-CoV-2 viruses. Breakthrough Delta and Omicron infections in Comirnaty and CoronaVac vaccinated individuals appeared to have higher within-host purifying selection at the full-genome and/or Spike gene levels. Vaccine-induced antibody or T cell responses did not appear to have significant impact on within-host SARS-CoV-2 evolution. Our findings suggest that vaccination does not increase SARS-CoV-2 protein sequence space and may not facilitate emergence of more viral variants.

5.
authorea preprints; 2022.
Preprint en Inglés | PREPRINT-AUTHOREA PREPRINTS | ID: ppzbmed-10.22541.au.165629347.75546543.v1

RESUMEN

Background: Safety and immunogenicity of 3 doses of BNT162b2 and CoronaVac in adult and pediatric patients with inborn errors of immunity (IEIs) remain unknown. Intradermal vaccination may improve immunogenicity in immunocompromised patients. Our study (NCT04800133) aimed to determine the safety and immunogenicity in patients with IEIs receiving a 3-dose primary series of mRNA vaccine BNT162b2 (age 12+) or inactivated whole-virion vaccine CoronaVac (age 3+) in Hong Kong, including Omicron BA.1 neutralization, in a nonrandomized manner. Intradermal vaccination was also studied. Methods Thirty-nine patients were vaccinated, including 16 with homologous intramuscular 0.3ml BNT162b2 and 17 with homologous intramuscular 0.5ml CoronaVac. Two patients received 3 doses of intradermal 0.5ml CoronaVac, and 4 patients received 2 doses of intramuscular BNT162b2 and the third dose with intradermal BNT162b2. Adverse reactions and adverse events were tracked for 7 and 28 days after each dose. Antibody responses assessed included binding IgG antibody to wild-type (WT) spike receptor-binding domain (S-RBD IgG) and surrogate neutralization activity to WT and BA.1 viruses. T cell responses were examined by intracellular cytokine staining following stimulation with SARS-CoV-2 peptide pool(s). Results No safety concerns were identified. Inadequate antibody responses were found after 2 doses in patients with humoral immunodeficiencies and especially so against BA.1. Dose 3 of either vaccine increased S-RBD IgG response. T cell responses against SARS-CoV-2 antigens were detected in vaccinated IEI patients. Intradermal third dose vaccine led to high antibody response in 4 patients. Conclusions The primary vaccination series of BNT162b2 and CoronaVac in adults and children with IEIs should include 3 doses for optimal immunogenicity.


Asunto(s)
Síndromes de Inmunodeficiencia , Errores Innatos del Metabolismo
6.
researchsquare; 2022.
Preprint en Inglés | PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE | ID: ppzbmed-10.21203.rs.3.rs-1790314.v1

RESUMEN

Vaccines that are broadly cross-protective against current and future SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOC) or across the sarbecoviruses subgenus remain a priority for public health. Virus neutralization is the best available correlate of protection. We used sera from cohorts of individuals vaccinated with two or three doses of RNA (BNT162b2) or inactivated SARS-CoV-2 (Coronavac or Sinopharm) vaccines with or without a history of previous SARS-CoV-2 or SARS-CoV-1 (in 2003) infection, to define the magnitude and breath of cross-neutralization in a multiplex surrogate neutralization assay based on virus spike receptor binding domain of multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOC), SARS-CoV-2 related bat and pangolin viruses, SARS-CoV-1 and related bat sarbecoviruses. SARS-CoV-2 or SARS-CoV-1 infection followed by BNT162b2 vaccine, Omicron BA.2 breakthrough infection following BNT162b2 vaccine or a third dose of BNT162b2 following two doses of BNT162b2 or CoronaVac elicited the highest and broadest neutralization across VOCs. Considering breadth and magnitude of neutralization across all sarbecoviruses, those infected with SARS-CoV-1 immunized with BNT162b2 outperformed all other combinations of infection and/or vaccination. These data may inform vaccine design strategies for generating broadly neutralizing antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 variants or across the sarbecovirus subgenus.

7.
medrxiv; 2022.
Preprint en Inglés | medRxiv | ID: ppzbmed-10.1101.2022.03.28.22273020

RESUMEN

We studied SARS-CoV-2 genomes from travelers arriving in Hong Kong from November-2021 to February-2022. Apart from detecting Omicron (BA.1, BA1.1. and BA.2) and Delta variants, we detected a BA.1/BA.2 recombinant in two epidemiologically linked cases. This recombinant has a breakpoint near the 5 end of Spike gene (nucleotide position 20055-21618).

8.
researchsquare; 2022.
Preprint en Inglés | PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE | ID: ppzbmed-10.21203.rs.3.rs-1327020.v1

RESUMEN

For SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, efficacy data for BNT162b2 but not CoronaVac are available in adolescents. Phase II/III studies focused on neutralizing antibody responses in adolescents, neglecting binding antibody and cellular responses that are also important against SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, we conducted a registered clinical study (NCT04800133) to establish immunobridging with various antibody and cellular immunity markers and to compare the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of these 2 vaccines in healthy adolescents. One-dose BNT162b2 outcomes were also assessed since it had been recommended in some localities due to the risk of myocarditis. Antibodies and T cell immune responses were non-inferior or similar in adolescents receiving 2 doses of BNT162b2 (BB, N=116) and CoronaVac (CC, N=123) versus adults after 2 doses of the same vaccine (BB, N=147; CC, N=141) but not in adolescents after 1 dose of BNT162b2 (B, N=116). CC induced SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (N) and N C-terminal domain seroconversion in more adolescents than adults. Adverse reactions were mostly mild for both vaccines and more frequent for BNT162b2. We confirmed higher S, neutralizing, avidity and Fc receptor-binding antibody responses in adolescents receiving BB than CC. This is the first study to show similar induction of strong S-specific T cells by the 2 vaccines, in addition to N- and M-specific T cells induced by CoronaVac but not BNT162b2 in adolescents. The implications of the differential ability to induce S- and non-S-specific antibody and T cell responses on the durability of protection and protection against virus variants by BNT162b2 and CoronaVac, the 2 most used SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in the world, should be further investigated. Our results support the use of both vaccines in adolescents.


Asunto(s)
Miocarditis
9.
researchsquare; 2022.
Preprint en Inglés | PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE | ID: ppzbmed-10.21203.rs.3.rs-1331606.v1

RESUMEN

SARS-CoV-2 Omicron subvariant BA.2 is increasing in some areas of the world and it is important to assess how well current vaccines may protect against this infection. BioNTech Pfizer (BNT162b2) and CoronaVac are widely used COVID-19 vaccines globally. We determined the 50% plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT50) and PRNT90 antibody titres to BA.2 virus in sera (twenty each collected 3-5 weeks after third dose) from cohorts vaccinated with three doses of BNT162b2, three doses of CoronaVac, two doses of CoronaVac followed by a third dose of BNT162b2 and those convalescent from SARS-CoV-2 (ancestral virus) (143-196 days after infection). We compared the PRNT titres to BA.2 with titres to BA.1 and ancestral virus. We demonstrate that PRNT50 and PRNT90 antibody titres to BA.2 are markedly reduced compared with those to ancestral virus and reduced as much as was observed for BA.1 virus. Those vaccinated with three doses of BNT162b2 or vaccinated with two doses of CoronaVac and a third dose of BNT162b2 develop PRNT antibody titres above the protective threshold from symptomatic infection. Those vaccinated with three doses of CoronaVac fail to achieve protective levels of PRNT50 antibody to BA.2 subvariant of Omicron 3-5 weeks after vaccination.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19
10.
researchsquare; 2022.
Preprint en Inglés | PREPRINT-RESEARCHSQUARE | ID: ppzbmed-10.21203.rs.3.rs-1207071.v1

RESUMEN

Omicron, a novel SARS-CoV-2 variant has emerged and is rapidly becoming the dominant SARS-CoV-2 virus circulating globally. It is important to define reductions in virus neutralizing activity in serum of convalescent or vaccinated individuals to understand potential loss of protection from infection or re-infection. Two doses of BNT162b2 or CoronaVac vaccines provided little 50% plaque reduction neutralization test (PRNT 50 ) antibody immunity against the Omicron variant, even at one-month post vaccination. Booster doses with BNT162b2 in those with two doses of either BNT162b2 or CoronaVac provided acceptable neutralizing immunity against Omicron variant at 1-month post-booster dose. However, three doses of BNT162b2 elicited higher levels of PRNT 50 antibody to Omicron variant suggesting longer duration of protection. Convalescent from SARS-CoV-2 infection did not have protective PRNT 50 antibody levels to Omicron, but a single dose of BNT162b2 vaccine provided protective immunity. Field vaccine-efficacy studies against Omicron variant against different vaccines are urgently needed.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA